More

    Latest Posts

    NBA 2K23: Boot Camp Comeback

    A6K is best on-line store for MT coins, we will offer you 2K23 MT coins at best price! This promo happens in the City...

    How to Claim Compensation For Damp and Mould

    There are a number of things to consider when claiming compensation for damp and mould. The first is to identify the cause of the...

    All you need to know about hotel management course

    INTRODUCTION: Are you planning to pursue a career in hotel management? Then you have come to the right place! In this blog post, we are...

    Cost of Scuba diving in Andaman

    INTRODUCTION: The cost of scuba diving in Andaman depends on type of dive you are doing, the number of dives, the type of equipment you...

    U.N. Global Warming treaty full of hot air

    Global warming rhetoric continues from radical environmentalists and even from our White House. But is the information we’re getting based on facts or is it just a lot of hot air?

    Recently, President Bill Clinton invited meteorologists from the top 50 media markets to the White House to help him convince the American people of climatic changes and global warming葉his in spite of 18 years of satellite research which has demonstrated a slight cooling trend in the atmosphere. In fact, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chant (I.P.C.C.), global warming predictions for the next century have actually decreased by nearly 40 %.

    In the same meeting with meteorologists, Vice President Gore alluded to overpopulation as the culprit for global warming and suggested abortion as one way to curb this “problem.”

    GUEST COMMENT

    “No goal is more crucial to healing the global environment than stabilizing human population,” Gore said.

    But again, the latest report from the I.P.C.C. reads, “Our ability to quantify the human influence on global climate is limited because there are uncertainties in key factors.”

    So why the intensified push by the White House to spread the “global warming” frenzy? Because the President is garnishing public support for a United Nations “Global Climate Treaty” being proposed at the international climate conference in Kyoto, Japan. There, the United States will likely agree to drastically restrict energy use to address global climate concerns謡ith little or no concern for the devastating effects this policy will have on America and on the American people. Many have argued that we need to better understand the science and the probable economic impact before we impose heavy burdens on the citizens of the world, but our President is not listening.

    Why should you be concerned? How will this policy affect you and your family? Economists say that achieving the proposed energy reduction would take huge energy price increases. For example, a 50-cent-per-gallon hike in gasoline and home heating oil. You can look forward to a 20% increase in electricity costs and to natural gas prices skyrocketing over 45%. These measures would cost our economy hundreds of billions of dollars each year in lost jobs and economic activity.

    If these concerns are not appalling enough, add the fact that only 34 of the 166 nations participating in the negotiations will be required to enforce these legally binding energy cuts. So, while the United States will be forced to lower energy use, countries like India, China and Mexico will not. Also, the proposed treaty could require that developing nations be compensated for any damage to their economies. In other words, we would have to pay oil producing nations like Iran and Kuwait for not buying their oil!

    Please join Concerned Women for America in letting President Clinton and your senators know that you oppose the U.N. Global Climate Treaty.


    Carmen Pate is vice president of communications with Concerned Women for America.

    Admin Mail : [email protected]